Prediction of Strong Kirchheimer vs Luke Jacob Gamble Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kirchheimer vs L. Jacob Gamble

Strong Kirchheimer
USA
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
30
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
622
C. Rank
Ret.
375
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Luke Jacob Gamble
USA
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
30
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
622
C. Rank
Ret.
375
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$8.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 0 Gamble
They have played 2 sets in total, with Strong Kirchheimer winning 2 and Luke Jacob Gamble winning 0. The last match between Strong Kirchheimer and Luke Jacob Gamble was at the M15 Champaign, 05-06-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirchheimer | 1 |
| Gamble | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Champaign(06-05-19)
Strong Kirchheimer
6
6
Luke Jacob Gamble
3
3
S. Kirchheimer vs L. J. Gamble H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $8,150 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.69% (313-270) | Career Total W/L | 45.00% (27-33) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Kirchheimer vs L. J. Gamble Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Strong Kirchheimer has won 47.78% of points on their second serve, while Luke Jacob Gamble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Strong Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Luke Jacob Gamble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Strong Kirchheimer has saved 60.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Luke Jacob Gamble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Strong Kirchheimer has won 38.10% of matches played (W/L 24/39), with Luke Jacob Gamble winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Strong Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 74/61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 174/153). Luke Jacob Gamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 19/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 5/11).
- Player level: In the last year, Strong Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.11% of matches (W/L 13/23), where as Luke Jacob Gamble has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Strong Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Luke Jacob Gamble being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Strong Kirchheimer winning 2 and Luke Jacob Gamble winning 0.
- The last match between Strong Kirchheimer and Luke Jacob Gamble was at the M15 Champaign, 05-06-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Strong Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 405.59 while Luke Jacob Gamble has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Strong Kirchheimer has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Luke Jacob Gamble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Strong Kirchheimer has converted 33.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Luke Jacob Gamble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Strong Kirchheimer vs Luke Jacob Gamble Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Kirchheimer vs L. J. Gamble H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:13:0 | Average Match Time | 1:13:0 |
| 80% (37/46) | 1st Serve % | 77% (37/48) |
| 84% (31/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
| 78% (7/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (21/48) | Return Points Win % | 17% (8/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kirchheimer 50%, Gamble 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kirchheimer 47%, Gamble 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kirchheimer 60%, Gamble 0%.
S. Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
L. J. Gamble Recent Matches Played

S. Kirchheimer vs L. J. Gamble Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.69% (313/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.00% (27/33) |
| 54.05% (728/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.66% (61/67) |
| 52.13% (6643/6100) | Games Win/Loss | 50.31% (577/570) |
| 53.21% (174/153) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 54.81% (74/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 31.25% (5/11) |
| 53.72% (65/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 2025 | Aces Total | 67 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1071 | Total Double Faults | 106 |
| 1:28:13 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 464.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 251.18 |
| 64% (21226/33011) | 1st Serve % | 68% (1267/1856) |
| 69% (14625/21226) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (812/1267) |
| 52% (6100/11785) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (277/589) |
| 39% (1253/3187) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (66/150) |
| 39% (12948/33623) | Return Points Win % | 37% (671/1837) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.54% (91/118) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.89% (218/146) | Futures W/L | 45.00% (27/33) |
| 54% (309/574) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (82/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 44% (80/182) | Deciding Set Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 82% (329/271) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (32/26) |
| 17% (329/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (32/6) |
| 17% (254/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (28/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.14
W2
6.15
08:30 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.099
W2
5.65
12:05 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.85
W2
1.85
08:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
2.76
W2
1.38
04:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.57
W2
2.48
08:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.76
W2
1.93
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
13 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 13, 2025
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:00
H2H 5-5
13:30
H2H 6-3
12:00
H2H 7-1
22:30
H2H 6-1
19:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal